Kaydedildi:
| Yazar: | |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | Preprint |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
2008
|
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.2592 |
| Etiketler: |
Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
|
| _version_ | 1866918183937507328 |
|---|---|
| author | Schwede, Stefan |
| author_facet | Schwede, Stefan |
| contents | The most commonly known triangulated categories arise from chain complexes in an abelian category by passing to chain homotopy classes or inverting quasi-isomorphisms. Such examples are called `algebraic' because they originate from abelian (or at least additive) categories. Stable homotopy theory produces examples of triangulated categories by quite different means, and in this context the source categories are usually very `non-additive' before passing to homotopy classes of morphisms. Because of their origin I refer to these examples as `topological triangulated categories'.
In these extended talk notes I explain some systematic differences between these two kinds of triangulated categories. There are certain properties -- defined entirely in terms of the triangulated structure -- which hold in all algebraic examples, but which fail in some topological ones. These differences are all torsion phenomena, and rationally there is no difference between algebraic and topological triangulated categories. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_0807_2592 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Algebraic versus topological triangulated categories Schwede, Stefan Algebraic Topology 18E30, 55P42 The most commonly known triangulated categories arise from chain complexes in an abelian category by passing to chain homotopy classes or inverting quasi-isomorphisms. Such examples are called `algebraic' because they originate from abelian (or at least additive) categories. Stable homotopy theory produces examples of triangulated categories by quite different means, and in this context the source categories are usually very `non-additive' before passing to homotopy classes of morphisms. Because of their origin I refer to these examples as `topological triangulated categories'. In these extended talk notes I explain some systematic differences between these two kinds of triangulated categories. There are certain properties -- defined entirely in terms of the triangulated structure -- which hold in all algebraic examples, but which fail in some topological ones. These differences are all torsion phenomena, and rationally there is no difference between algebraic and topological triangulated categories. |
| title | Algebraic versus topological triangulated categories |
| topic | Algebraic Topology 18E30, 55P42 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.2592 |