Đã lưu trong:
Chi tiết về thư mục
Những tác giả chính: Herold, Alexander, Sobotka, Daniel, Beer, Lucian, Bastati, Nina, Poetter-Lang, Sarah, Weber, Michael, Reiberger, Thomas, Mandorfer, Mattias, Semmler, Georg, Simbrunner, Benedikt, Wichtmann, Barbara D., Ba-Ssalamah, Sami A., Trauner, Michael, Ba-Ssalamah, Ahmed, Langs, Georg
Định dạng: Preprint
Được phát hành: 2025
Những chủ đề:
Truy cập trực tuyến:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08039
Các nhãn: Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
Mục lục:
  • Background: We aimed to quantify hepatic vessel volumes across chronic liver disease stages and healthy controls using deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis, and assess correlations with biomarkers for liver (dys)function and fibrosis/portal hypertension. Methods: We assessed retrospectively healthy controls, non-advanced and advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) patients using a 3D U-Net model for hepatic vessel segmentation on portal venous phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-T MRI. Total (TVVR), hepatic (HVVR), and intrahepatic portal vein-to-volume ratios (PVVR) were compared between groups and correlated with: albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) and model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) score, and fibrosis/portal hypertension (Fibrosis-4 [FIB-4] score, liver stiffness measurement [LSM], hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG], platelet count [PLT], and spleen volume). Results: We included 197 subjects, aged 54.9 $\pm$ 13.8 years (mean $\pm$ standard deviation), 111 males (56.3\%): 35 healthy controls, 44 non-ACLD, and 118 ACLD patients. TVVR and HVVR were highest in controls (3.9; 2.1), intermediate in non-ACLD (2.8; 1.7), and lowest in ACLD patients (2.3; 1.0) ($p \leq 0.001$). PVVR was reduced in both non-ACLD and ACLD patients (both 1.2) compared to controls (1.7) ($p \leq 0.001$), but showed no difference between CLD groups ($p = 0.999$). HVVR significantly correlated indirectly with FIB-4, ALBI, MELD-Na, LSM, and spleen volume ($ρ$ ranging from -0.27 to -0.40), and directly with PLT ($ρ= 0.36$). TVVR and PVVR showed similar but weaker correlations. Conclusions: Deep learning-based hepatic vessel volumetry demonstrated differences between healthy liver and chronic liver disease stages and shows correlations with established markers of disease severity.