Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Autors principals: Aleti, Aldeida, Ray, Baishakhi, Hoda, Rashina, Chen, Simin
Format: Preprint
Publicat: 2026
Matèries:
Accés en línia:https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06310
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
_version_ 1866912882993659904
author Aleti, Aldeida
Ray, Baishakhi
Hoda, Rashina
Chen, Simin
author_facet Aleti, Aldeida
Ray, Baishakhi
Hoda, Rashina
Chen, Simin
contents With the rapid rise of AI coding agents, the fundamental premise of what it means to be a software engineer is in question. In this vision paper, we re-examine what it means for an AI agent to be considered a software engineer and then critically think about what makes such an agent trustworthy. \textit{Grounded} in established definitions of software engineering (SE) and informed by recent research on agentic AI systems, we conceptualise AI software engineers as participants in human-AI SE teams composed of human software engineers and AI models and tools, and we distinguish trustworthiness as a key property of these systems and actors rather than a subjective human attitude. Based on historical perspectives and emerging visions, we identify key dimensions that contribute to the trustworthiness of AI software engineers, spanning technical quality, transparency and accountability, epistemic humility, and societal and ethical alignment. We further discuss how trustworthiness can be evaluated and demonstrated, highlighting a fundamental trust measurement gap: not everything that matters for trust can be easily measured. Finally, we outline implications for the design, evaluation, and governance of AI SE systems, advocating for an ethics-by-design approach to enable appropriate trust in future human-AI SE teams.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_06310
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Trustworthy AI Software Engineers
Aleti, Aldeida
Ray, Baishakhi
Hoda, Rashina
Chen, Simin
Software Engineering
With the rapid rise of AI coding agents, the fundamental premise of what it means to be a software engineer is in question. In this vision paper, we re-examine what it means for an AI agent to be considered a software engineer and then critically think about what makes such an agent trustworthy. \textit{Grounded} in established definitions of software engineering (SE) and informed by recent research on agentic AI systems, we conceptualise AI software engineers as participants in human-AI SE teams composed of human software engineers and AI models and tools, and we distinguish trustworthiness as a key property of these systems and actors rather than a subjective human attitude. Based on historical perspectives and emerging visions, we identify key dimensions that contribute to the trustworthiness of AI software engineers, spanning technical quality, transparency and accountability, epistemic humility, and societal and ethical alignment. We further discuss how trustworthiness can be evaluated and demonstrated, highlighting a fundamental trust measurement gap: not everything that matters for trust can be easily measured. Finally, we outline implications for the design, evaluation, and governance of AI SE systems, advocating for an ethics-by-design approach to enable appropriate trust in future human-AI SE teams.
title Trustworthy AI Software Engineers
topic Software Engineering
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06310