محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Takashi Saitoh, Joel E. Cohen
التنسيق: Artículo Open Access
منشور في: Wiley 2024
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://esj-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1438-390X.12176
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1867009935032713216
author Takashi Saitoh
Joel E. Cohen
author_facet Takashi Saitoh
Joel E. Cohen
Takashi Saitoh
Joel E. Cohen
collection Wiley Open Access
contents Quantifying factors that explain the slopes of the temporal Taylor's law of Hokkaido vole populations Takashi Saitoh Joel E. Cohen Population Ecology AbstractTaylor's law (TL) describes the relationship between the variance and mean of population density: log10(variance) ≈ log10(a) + b × log10(mean), a > 0. This study analyzed the temporal TL, for which mean and variance are calculated over time, separately for each population in a collection of populations, considering the effects of the parameters of the Gompertz model (a second‐order autoregressive time‐series model) and the skewness of the density frequency distribution. Time series of 162 populations of the gray‐sided vole in Hokkaido, Japan, spanning 23–31 years, satisfied the temporal TL: log10(variancej) ≈ 0.199 + 1.687 × log10(meanj). This model explained 62% of the variation of log10(variancej). An extended model with explanatory variables log10(meanj), the density‐dependent coefficient for 1‐year lag (α1,j), that for 2‐year lag (α2,j), the density‐independent variability (σj2), and the skewness (γj), explained 93.9% of the log10(variancej) variation. In the extended model, the coefficient of log10(meanj) was 1.949, close to the null value (b = 2) of the TL slope. The standardized partial regression coefficients indicated that density‐independent effects (σj2 and γj) dominated density‐dependent effects (α1,j and α2,j) apart from log10(meanj). The negative correlations observed between σj2 and log10(meanj), and between γj and log10(meanj), played an essential role in explaining the difference between the estimated slope of TL (b = 1.687) and the null slope (b = 2). The effects of those explanatory variables on log10(variancej) were interpreted based on the theory of a second‐order autoregressive time‐series model. 10.1002/1438-390x.12176 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1438-390x.12176
format Artículo Open Access
id wiley_oa_10_1002_1438_390x_12176
institution Wiley Open Access
license_str_mv http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format wiley_oa
spellingShingle Quantifying factors that explain the slopes of the temporal Taylor's law of Hokkaido vole populations
Takashi Saitoh
Joel E. Cohen
Population Ecology
Quantifying factors that explain the slopes of the temporal Taylor's law of Hokkaido vole populations Takashi Saitoh Joel E. Cohen Population Ecology AbstractTaylor's law (TL) describes the relationship between the variance and mean of population density: log10(variance) ≈ log10(a) + b × log10(mean), a > 0. This study analyzed the temporal TL, for which mean and variance are calculated over time, separately for each population in a collection of populations, considering the effects of the parameters of the Gompertz model (a second‐order autoregressive time‐series model) and the skewness of the density frequency distribution. Time series of 162 populations of the gray‐sided vole in Hokkaido, Japan, spanning 23–31 years, satisfied the temporal TL: log10(variancej) ≈ 0.199 + 1.687 × log10(meanj). This model explained 62% of the variation of log10(variancej). An extended model with explanatory variables log10(meanj), the density‐dependent coefficient for 1‐year lag (α1,j), that for 2‐year lag (α2,j), the density‐independent variability (σj2), and the skewness (γj), explained 93.9% of the log10(variancej) variation. In the extended model, the coefficient of log10(meanj) was 1.949, close to the null value (b = 2) of the TL slope. The standardized partial regression coefficients indicated that density‐independent effects (σj2 and γj) dominated density‐dependent effects (α1,j and α2,j) apart from log10(meanj). The negative correlations observed between σj2 and log10(meanj), and between γj and log10(meanj), played an essential role in explaining the difference between the estimated slope of TL (b = 1.687) and the null slope (b = 2). The effects of those explanatory variables on log10(variancej) were interpreted based on the theory of a second‐order autoregressive time‐series model. 10.1002/1438-390x.12176 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
title Quantifying factors that explain the slopes of the temporal Taylor's law of Hokkaido vole populations
topic Population Ecology
url https://esj-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1438-390X.12176