Guardat en:
| Autors principals: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Idioma: | anglès |
| Publicat: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.70016 |
| Etiquetes: |
Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
| _version_ | 1866901713327226880 |
|---|---|
| author | Dorsch, John Goddu, Mariel Nave, Kathryn Vierkant, Tillmann Coeckelbergh, Mark Gürtler, Paula Urban, Petr Spang, Friderike Moll, Maximilian |
| author_facet | Dorsch, John Goddu, Mariel Nave, Kathryn Vierkant, Tillmann Coeckelbergh, Mark Gürtler, Paula Urban, Petr Spang, Friderike Moll, Maximilian |
| contents | <p><span lang="EN">In this Comment, we critique the growing “AI welfare” movement and propose a novel guideline, the Precarity Guideline, to determine care entitlement. In contrast to approaches that emphasize potential for suffering, the Precarity Guideline is grounded in empirically identifiable features. The severity of ongoing humanitarian crises, biodiversity loss, climate change provide additional reasons to prioritize the needs of living beings over machine learning algorithms as candidates for care.</span></p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_1002_aaai_70016 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Against AI Welfare: Care Practices Should Prioritize Living Beings Over AI Dorsch, John Goddu, Mariel Nave, Kathryn Vierkant, Tillmann Coeckelbergh, Mark Gürtler, Paula Urban, Petr Spang, Friderike Moll, Maximilian AI Ethics Environmental Ethics Animal Ethics AI Welfare Precarity <p><span lang="EN">In this Comment, we critique the growing “AI welfare” movement and propose a novel guideline, the Precarity Guideline, to determine care entitlement. In contrast to approaches that emphasize potential for suffering, the Precarity Guideline is grounded in empirically identifiable features. The severity of ongoing humanitarian crises, biodiversity loss, climate change provide additional reasons to prioritize the needs of living beings over machine learning algorithms as candidates for care.</span></p> |
| title | Against AI Welfare: Care Practices Should Prioritize Living Beings Over AI |
| topic | AI Ethics Environmental Ethics Animal Ethics AI Welfare Precarity |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.70016 |