Збережено в:
| Автори: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Recurso digital |
| Мова: | |
| Опубліковано: |
Zenodo
2017
|
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14669121 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
Зміст:
- Figure 4: (A) Measured (n = 16) vs. predicted glucose content (% of dry weight) for wet Ulva fasciata obtained for the best-fit model (second derivative of reflectance spectra when applied on selected wavelengths). (B) Partial least squares loadings vectors (LV1–3) for the optimal calibration model as calculated for glucose content using wet samples data set. (C) Score plot for the partial least squares best-fit model for glucose content using wet samples. Note the separation between samples with nutrient supply (denoted as wet 9–wet 16, located on the left side of the score plot) and those without nutrient supply (denoted as wet 1–wet 8, located on the right side of the plot) as evident from the score plot.