I tiakina i:
| Ngā kaituhi matua: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Hōputu: | Recurso digital |
| Reo: | |
| I whakaputaina: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Ngā marau: | |
| Urunga tuihono: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14773629 |
| Ngā Tūtohu: |
Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
|
Rārangi ihirangi:
- <p><b><i>Megaphragma wolfi</i> Lahey & Polaszek, sp. nov.</b></p><p>https://zoobank.org/ 41966092-7058-44DF-8B21-6E6A4DD18E85</p><p>(Figures 2–8)</p><p><i>Diagnosis</i></p><p>Both sexes wingless; tegulae absent. Male antenna with 6 antennomeres, three-segmented clava, and C1 approximately 3× length of C2 (male of <i>M. giraulti</i> with 5 antennomeres, two-segmented clava, and C1 approximately 2× length of C2; males unknown in other <i>polychaetum</i> -group species). Female antenna with 5 antennomeres and clava two-segmented. C1 with one UST (females of <i>M. giraulti, M. kinuthiae</i> and <i>M. polychaetum</i> with two UST on C1) and no apparent MT (female of <i>M. giraulti</i> with ≥10 MT on C1).</p><p><i>Description</i></p><p><i>Male.</i> 200–250 µm long. Body largely pale brown, metasoma darker, especially metasomal calluses.</p><p>Antenna (Figure 3) with six antennomeres, excluding the conical anellus; elongate funicle present; clava three-segmented. Funicle with one MT; C1 and C2 each with one minute MT; C3 with two very long MPS and two SB.</p><p>Head with prominent ocular seta (os: Figure 4); genal seta present (gs: Figure 4). Midlobe of mesoscutum entirely smooth, laterally with two pairs of long setae (Figure 8). Propodeum without crenulae and with long seta adjacent to spiracle (Figure 8). Metasoma with a pair of reticulate calluses on each tergite (Figure 2). All tarsi longer than corresponding tibiae; apical tarsal segment the longest, fore leg with basitarsus much shorter than basitarsus of mid and hind legs. Wings absent, with no apparent trace of vestiges or tegulae.</p><p><i>Female.</i> 230 µm long. Metasoma paler than in male. Antenna (Figure 6) with five antennomeres, excluding the conical anellus; conical funicle present, slightly longer than greatest (apical) width, with one MT; clava with two antennomeres; C1 with one UST and one ASC; C2 with two MPS and two SB. Metasoma without calluses; fore basitarsus shorter than corresponding segment in the male. Ovipositor length equal to mid tibia length.</p><p><i>Material Examined</i></p><p>Holotype ♂ (deposited in NHMUK). USA: South Carolina, Charleston, U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, 32°46′36′′N, 80°3′39′′W 26.iv.2023 Z. Lahey Z378 OSUC 863878 (NHMUK). Paratypes 1 ♀ (OSUC 864114), 1♂ (OSUC 864115), same data as holotype (NHMUK); 3♂♂ same data as holotype except 1♂ (OSUC 863877) 28.iv.2023 (UCRC) 2♂♂ (OSUC 864116, 864,117) 1.v.2023 (USNM; NHMUK). 1♂ COSTA RICA: Puntarenas, Las Cruces, Wilson Botanical Garden, 8°46′N 82°57′W 1300 m JS Noyes ii.2015 BMNH (E) 2015–57 (NHMUK).</p><p><i>Species-group placement.</i> <i>Megaphragma polychaetum</i> -group (Polaszek <i>et al</i>. 2022).</p><p><i>Distribution</i></p><p>Costa Rica; South Carolina (USA).</p><p><i>Host.</i> Unknown.</p><p><i>DNA data.</i> COI: six sequences; 28S: six sequences (all from South Carolina, USA).</p><p><i>Etymology</i></p><p>Named for Wolf Xavier Polaszek Nieuwenhuijse, grandson of the second author (AP). The epithet is treated as a noun in the genitive case.</p><p><i>Comments.</i> The only wingless trichogrammatid female known to us is that of <i>M. wolfi</i>. In addition to <i>Megaphragma</i>, aptery has been recorded in males of three other genera: <i>Prestwichia</i> Lubbock, <i>Trichogramma</i> Westwood and <i>Monorthochaeta</i> Blood (Doutt and Viggiani 1968; Pinto 2006). Morphologically, the males of <i>M. wolfi</i> are most likely to be confused with those of <i>Prestwichia</i> due to overall size, similarity in habitus and structure of the antenna, but only the last character can be used to differentiate wingless species of the two genera. The antenna of <i>Megaphragma</i> has a maximum of three postannelar segments (some species with two), whereas <i>Prestwichia</i> always has four postannelar segments (Pinto 2006; Polaszek <i>et al</i>. 2022).</p><p><i>Phylogenetic Analyses.</i> Single (COI, 28S) and combined (COI+28S) phylogenetic analyses were conducted on 180 <i>Megaphragma</i> specimens and nine outgroups. Seven specimens, six of which belong to <i>M. wolfi</i> and one belonging to a member of the <i>M. ghesquierei</i> -group, were newly sequenced for this study and were incorporated into the molecular dataset analysed by Polaszek <i>et al</i>. (2022). The 28S alignment contained 164 <i>Megaphragma</i> sequences and was 955 characters (bp + gaps) in length. The best-fit nucleotide substitution model for this analysis was TIM3e+R4. The COI alignment contained 120 <i>Megaphragma</i> sequences and was 651 characters (bp + gaps) in length. The 1st and 2nd codon positions of COI were merged into a single partition under the TVM +F + I+ G4 substitution model, and the best-fit substitution model of the 3rd codon position was K3Pu+F+ R2. The combined analysis contained terminals for 189 specimens (180 <i>Megaphragma</i> and nine outgroups) and was 1,606 characters (bp + gaps) in length. Three partitions were specified in this analysis: (1) 28S (GTR+F+ R4); (2) the 1st and 2nd codon position of COI (TVM+F + I+ G4); and (3) the 3rd codon position of COI (TIM+F+ R4).</p><p>Relationships between <i>Megaphragma</i> species and species groups in our analyses largely mirror those of Polaszek <i>et al</i>. (2022). We limit our discussion of these relationships to the results obtained by us in the combined molecular analysis since this dataset is the most comprehensive in the number of characters and taxa evaluated (see Supplementary Material for single gene phylogenies). Two major clades were recovered in our analysis (Figure 9). The first major clade was composed of <i>M. liui</i> Polaszek & Fusu (<i>ghesquierei</i> -group), members of the <i>polychaetum</i> -group, two undescribed species that Polaszek <i>et al</i>. (2022) posited belong to the <i>polychaetum</i> -group and the monophyletic <i>mymaripenne</i> -group. The second major clade recovered was composed of the monophyletic <i>antecessor</i> -group and the <i>ghesquierei</i> -group, which was rendered paraphyletic by the <i>antecessor</i> -group and the placement of <i>Me. liui</i> as the sister to all other <i>Megaphragma. Megaphragma wolfi</i> was recovered within the <i>polychaetum</i> -group as the sister taxon to <i>M. cockerilli</i> Polaszek & Fusu, a result highly consistent with its antennal morphology.</p><p>Our results deviate from Polaszek <i>et al</i>. (2022) in the placement of the <i>antecessor</i> -group as the sister taxon to the <i>ghesquierei</i> -group, whereas Polaszek <i>et al</i>. (2022) recovered the <i>antecessor</i> -group as the sister taxon to the <i>polychaetum</i> + <i>mymaripenne</i> -groups. This result may be due to the inclusion of a <i>ghesquierei</i> - group species from Congo for which only 28S is available. The position of <i>M. liui</i> as the sister to the remaining <i>Megaphragma</i> is also quite different than its placement as the sister taxon to the <i>antecessor</i> -group in Polaszek <i>et al</i>. (2022), potentially because <i>M. liui</i> is represented by a single, short COI sequence in our analyses compared with their study that also included a short 28S sequence. The <i>M. liui</i> 28S sequence was removed from our dataset prior to alignment because it behaved inconsistently in pilot analyses, frequently rendering the genus paraphyletic by grouping with <i>Prestwichia</i> in both single gene (28S only) and combined phylogenies.</p>