Saved in:
| Hovedforfatter: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Sprog: | |
| Udgivet: |
Zenodo
2019
|
| Online adgang: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14789263 |
| Tags: |
Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
Indholdsfortegnelse:
- <p>Professor Maurizio Pagano has made some very interesting contributions to the subject of the universal. In addition to the rigour of his historiographical analyses in the idealist tradition, and particularly in the work of Hegel, Professor Pagano has taken a particular interest in the introduction of this venerable question into a contemporary context marked by philosophies of difference. His inquiry starts from the paradox that not only human reason aspires to universality, but also every human being and every culture, however particular. For its part, that reason which aspires to universality, and in which it recognises itself as reason, after the vicissitudes of post-Hegelian philosophy, has discovered itself to be finite, weak, and hermeneutic. The acute awareness of this paradox has stimulated many of Professor Pagano's works. The interest of this article lies in detecting the tension between universal and absolute reason, on the one hand, and the particular and finite human being on the other,<sup>[1]</sup> or, in other words, between the intellect and the self, in Hegel's work, and therefore in the clarification of what Hegel means by ‘finite spirit’. This leads us to detect the anthropological roots, in the deep and dark —unconscious— well of the soul, of consciousness and reason.</p>