Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15008421 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>When someone becomes a broken, unproductive toy—whether due to social, psychological, or structural wear and tear—their fate seems to split into two paths: teaching or indigence. Often, these two intertwine, given the precarious nature of the former and the inevitability of the latter when knowledge loses its market value. In a world where access to information is nearly universal, teaching becomes a residue of the system, a sort of limbo for those discarded by the productive machine but still capable of articulating ideas.</p> <p>Yet here lies the paradox: what is the point of charging for teaching something that is already known? Or worse, for transmitting knowledge that belongs to everyone? Science, which presents itself as an impartial and natural entity, is actually a continuous exercise in classifying and redefining our understanding of reality. It is assumed to be the study of nature, but more than that, it is the construction of a narrative about it—a narrative that is constantly being reformed, deconstructed, and rebuilt according to the parameters of the time.</p>