Bewaard in:
| Hoofdauteurs: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formaat: | Recurso digital |
| Taal: | Oudengels |
| Gepubliceerd in: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Onderwerpen: | |
| Online toegang: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15239778 |
| Tags: |
Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!
|
Inhoudsopgave:
- <p>Indonesia performs worse in innovation outputs than innovation inputs in 2024. This year Indonesia ranks 54th in innovation inputs and Indonesia was included in upper middle-income group together with countries such as China, Thailand, Brazil, Republic of Moldova, South Africa, Jamaica. One of the efforts to become a world-class intellectual property office is the Intellectual Property Office in a country by implementing dynamic governance that has the characteristics of thinking ahead, thinking again, thinking across, able people and agile process. Therefore, in order to implement dynamic governance, it is necessary to study what form of intellectual property office is appropriate that is able to become a world-class intellectual property office, whether in the form of a directorate under the Ministry of Law, whether in the form of an autonomous body or whether in the form of state own enterprise. From the comparison results between Fuzzy VIKOR and Fuzzy TOPSIS, there are almost similarities in determine the appropriate organizational form for managing intellectual property office in Indonesia based on dynamic governance and dynamic capabilities, only different in the first and second options. For Fuzzy VIKOR, the first option is Intellectual Property State-Owned Enterprise, while for Fuzzy TOPSIS, the first option is Intellectual Property Agency. The second option Fuzzy VIKOR is Intellectual Property Agency and second option Fuzzy TOPSIS is Intellectual Property State-Owned Enterprise. The third option for Fuzzy VIKOR and Fuzzy TOPSIS is the same, namely Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DJKI) Ministry of Law RI.</p>