Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2024
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15864738 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
Sommario:
- FIGURE 4 Percentage taxon match between soil eDNA sites and theoretical compositions of Nature in Norway (NiN) forest types. For comparison purposes, soil sampling sites (y axis) are labelled according to forest types (x axis) reported for each location in Eriksen et al. (2019) and Lieungh (2022). The percentage taxon match is calculated as twice the number of identical names in both taxon lists divided by the sum of total taxa in each list. Numbers of soil samples vary across forest types. Forest types: C1, calcium-poor submesic forest; C2, intermediately calcium-rich submesic forest; C5 calcium-poor submesic to subxeric forest; C6 intermediately calcium-rich submesic to subxeric forest; C9 calcium-poor subxeric forest; C13 calcium-poor xeric forest.