محفوظ في:
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | Recurso digital |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17208302 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
جدول المحتويات:
- <p>This paper presents systematic solutions to seven classical paradoxes that have challenged philosophers, logicians, and theorists for centuries. Using clear logical analysis and cross-cultural philosophical frameworks, we demonstrate that most of these "paradoxes" result from false premises, category errors, or problems already resolved in other intellectual traditions.</p> <p> </p> <p>The paradoxes addressed include:</p> <p>- Population-Complexity Paradox (linguistics)</p> <p>- Code-talker Paradox (linguistics) </p> <p>- Liar Paradox (logic)</p> <p>- Zeno's Achilles Paradox (mathematics/philosophy)</p> <p>- Russell's Paradox (set theory)</p> <p>- Curry's Paradox (logic)</p> <p>- Moravec's Paradox (robotics/AI)</p> <p> </p> <p>Our approach emphasizes practical reasoning over academic complexity, revealing that many seemingly intractable problems dissolve under straightforward logical scrutiny. The solutions span multiple domains including logic, linguistics, set theory, robotics, and epistemology, with particular integration of insights from Nyaya Darshan (Indian epistemology).</p> <p> </p> <p>Key contributions include identification of common patterns in paradox formation (false premises, category errors, already solved problems), demonstration of cross-cultural philosophical integration benefits, and provision of clear, accessible solutions to longstanding academic problems.</p> <p> </p>