Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17780464 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>This dataset contains the results of a benchmarking experiment comparing the performance of ConVer-G (a versioned quad store approach based on PostgreSQL) against Apache Jena TDB2. The experiment evaluates query execution times and storage sizes using the BEAR-B dataset with a Time-Based (TB) policy and daily granularity.</p> <p>Methodology<br>- Dataset: BEAR-B (Benchmark of RDF Archives - B).<br>- Tools Compared:<br> - conver-g: ConVer-G implementation (PostgreSQL based).<br> - conver-g-flat: A flattened version of ConVer-G (PostgreSQL based).<br> - jena-tdb-2: Apache Jena TDB2.<br>- Metrics:<br> - Query Execution Time (ms): Measured for various query types (join, p, po).<br> - Storage Size (bytes): Disk space consumed by the data.<br>- Statistical Analysis:<br> - Shapiro-Wilk Test: Used to check the normality of the response time distributions.<br> - Mann-Whitney U Test: Used to determine if there are statistically significant differences in performance between the tools.</p>