Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17822317 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Tabla de Contenidos:
- <p><strong>This publication is written in Spanish.<br></strong></p> <h3><strong>ESPAÑOL / SPANISH</strong></h3> <p><strong>Sobre el género y alcance de la obra</strong><br>Este libro no es una monografía académica, ni un estudio empírico, ni un reporte técnico. Se inscribe en la tradición del <strong>ensayo teórico-filosófico</strong> sobre tecnología y sociedad. Su validez es heurística y conceptual: desarrolla un marco semiótico (ASGA/MSIA), propone un vocabulario crítico (CFI/CFD, Poética Vectorial Abductiva, Sujeto Curador, Capitalismo de la Necesidad Exacerbada) y busca abrir preguntas y categorías interpretativas, no presentar evidencia empírica.</p> <h3><strong>ENGLISH</strong></h3> <p><strong>On the genre and scope of this work</strong><br>This book is not an academic monograph, nor an empirical study, nor a technical report. It belongs to the tradition of the <strong>theoretical–philosophical essay</strong> on technology and society. Its validity is heuristic and conceptual: it develops a semiotic framework (ASGA/MSIA), proposes a critical vocabulary (CFI/CFD, Abductive Vectorial Poetics, Curatorial Subject, Capitalism of Exacerbated Necessity), and seeks to open interpretive questions and categories rather than present empirical evidence.</p> <p><strong>PURPOSE OF THE WORK</strong></p> <p>This book is neither a technical manual nor an engineering treatise. It does not aim to describe architectures, algorithms, or mathematical procedures, nor is it a guide to crafting prompts or using ChatGPT. Instead, it is a text that, from a transversal perspective—drawing on language studies, ethics, and human consciousness—seeks to contribute to the search for answers regarding what large language models and the broader ecosystem of generative artificial intelligence truly represent in our lives.</p> <p>Our intention is to intervene in the current debate on the cultural, semiotic, and existential meaning of algorithmic intelligence from a philosophical and critical standpoint.</p> <p>The work dialogues with Philosophy of Technology, Critical Theory, and Peircean Semiotics, understanding AI not merely as a computational product but as a discursive and cultural phenomenon that transforms our relationship with the sign, cognition, and the social fabric. It introduces concepts such as the <em>Agencia Semiótica Generativa Abductiva (ASGA)</em>, the <em>Poética Vectorial Abductiva (PVA)</em>, the <em>Cero Falso Demandante (CFD)</em>, <em>Homo necessitatus</em>, and the <em>Red de la Necesidad Semiótica (RNS)</em>—not to replace technical terminology, but to offer a critical and analytical vocabulary capable of naming phenomena that traditional theory does not yet adequately describe, given how recent and widespread our encounter with this technology is.</p> <p>This essay positions itself within the debate on whether AI “thinks” or will replace humans—not to refute, but to clarify what this fourth industrial revolution implies for the development of critical thought and for the enhancement of the abilities and competencies that characterize us as a species, while also exposing our growing technological dependence.</p> <p>It is addressed to readers who wish to understand not how machines are built, but what they <em>mean</em>; to those interested in the cultural, cognitive, and political effects of contemporary algorithmic systems; and to those seeking conceptual tools to engage critically and sovereignly with generative intelligence through the perspective of the <em>Sujeto Curador</em> (Curatorial Subject).</p> <p>The validity of this framework does not depend on its correspondence with specific architectures but on its ability to illuminate the symbolic transformations emerging in the algorithmic age. This book does not explain how the machine works internally, but it may help readers understand the importance of visualizing the relations of interdependence generated by its functioning and its very existence. The paradox lies within the <em>Red de la Necesidad Semiótica</em>.</p>