Rārangi ihirangi: :: Library Catalog

I tiakina i:

Ngā taipitopito rārangi puna kōrero
Kaituhi matua:	Chen, Jen-Hsuan
Hōputu:	Recurso digital
Reo:	Ingarihi
I whakaputaina:	Zenodo 2025
Ngā marau:	narrative structure temporal analysis existential commitment phase-topology structural narratology
Urunga tuihono:	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17830693
Ngā Tūtohu:	Tāpirihia he Tūtohu Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!

Rārangi ihirangi:

This study introduces narrative phase-topology as a descriptive analytical vocabulary for examining how narrative structures generate states of existential commitment—positions in which characters (and readers) are placed in relations of irreversibility, responsibility, and non-recoverable consequences. The framework does not propose a formal mathematical model; instead, it provides a structural language for tracing how motivation, action, and consequence are distributed, reordered, or collapsed across narrative time. Using the Attack on Titan (pre-Sea arc) and Frieren: Beyond Journey’s End as contrasting case studies, this paper demonstrates that the two works—despite stark differences in tone, pacing, and affective density—instantiate the same existential root-structure through sharply opposed narrative configurations. Attack on Titan exhibits a high-curvature collapse topology, in which action precedes clarified motivation, multi-layered sacrifice reveals competing motivational vectors, and ethical cycles compress characters into unavoidable positions of responsibility. In contrast, Frieren presents a stable radiative topology, where performative declarations pre-establish a steady existential position, actions unfold as long-duration extensions of prior commitments, and emotional visibility emerges gradually across an extended temporal field. To account for cross-temporal phenomena in Frieren, the paper proposes the notion of a temporal relay: a material anchor (e.g., Himmel’s statues) that stores an uncompleted affective or ethical vector, allowing it to re-enter perception at a later temporal slice. This articulation highlights a form of asynchronous love or non-reciprocal ethics, in which meaning is constituted without guarantees of recognition, reciprocity, or synchronous understanding. Across both works, existential meaning arises not from moral intention or thematic content, but from how narratives configure phase sequences, distribute tension, and position agents within structures of irreversibility. The phase-topological vocabulary developed here may support future research in narrative theory and AI narrative generation, suggesting that the depth of a story depends less on emotional expression and more on how the narrative engineers commitment, non-recoverability, and reactivation nodes across time.

Ngā tūemi rite