Guardat en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Idioma: | anglès |
| Publicat: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17862990 |
| Etiquetes: |
Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
Taula de continguts:
- <h3>Summary</h3> <p>This release proposes a three-stage methodology for testing whether cryptocurrency whitepaper claims align<br>with market behavior:</p> <ol> <li><strong>Extract functional profiles</strong> from whitepapers using zero-shot classification (BART-MNLI) against a<br>10-category taxonomy</li> <li><strong>Construct market profiles</strong> from trading data (returns, volatility, Sharpe ratio, drawdown, volume<br>metrics)</li> <li><strong>Measure alignment</strong> using Procrustes rotation and Tucker's congruence coefficient</li> </ol> <p><strong>Key insight:</strong> Bitcoin's whitepaper emphasizes "peer-to-peer electronic cash" while markets price BTC as<br>"digital gold"—illustrating the core problem. Whitepapers capture <em>static founding mandates</em>, while<br>market profiles capture <em>evolved market utility</em>. The gap between them is what this framework measures.</p> <h3>Pilot Results (Illustrative)</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Overall congruence:</strong> φ = 0.719 (95% CI: [0.623, 0.953])</li> <li><strong>Interpretation:</strong> "Some similarity" — non-random correspondence but systematic divergence in specific<br>dimensions</li> <li><strong>N = 8:</strong> Sample is illustrative only; methodology is the contribution, not the point estimates</li> </ul> <h3>Changes from v2.0.0</h3> <ul> <li>Reframed as methodology proposal (not empirical findings)</li> <li>Changed "marketing vs reality" framing to "static mandate vs evolved utility"</li> <li>Fixed terminology: market matrix uses summary statistics (8×7), not tensor-derived factors</li> <li>Expanded limitations section acknowledging N=8 constraints</li> <li>Regenerated figures to match actual methodology</li> <li>Fixed self-citation with correct title and findings</li> </ul> <h3>Files</h3> <ul> <li><code>Farzulla_2025_Narrative_Alignment_v2.0.1.pdf</code> — Compiled paper</li> <li><code>Farzulla_2025_Narrative_Alignment_v2.0.1.tex</code> — LaTeX source</li> </ul> <h3>Citation</h3> <div> <pre><span>@techreport</span>{<span>Farzulla2025NarrativeAlignment</span>, <span>author</span> = <span><span>{</span>Farzulla, Murad<span>}</span></span>, <span>title</span> = <span><span>{</span>Testing Narrative-Market Alignment in Cryptocurrency: A Methodological Framework<span>}</span></span>, <span>institution</span> = <span><span>{</span>Farzulla Research<span>}</span></span>, <span>year</span> = <span><span>{</span>2025<span>}</span></span>, <span>type</span> = <span><span>{</span>Preprint<span>}</span></span>, <span>version</span> = <span><span>{</span>2.0.1<span>}</span></span>, <span>doi</span> = <span><span>{</span>10.5281/zenodo.17772652<span>}</span></span> } <span>License</span> <span>- Code: MIT</span> <span>- Paper: CC-BY-4.0</span></pre> </div>