Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Zenodo
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18098558 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Inhaltsangabe:
- <p>The Theory of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA) is a cross-domain theoretical framework that formalizes the conditions under which systems remain viable in the presence of entropy, noise, and structural degradation. Rather than competing with dynamical, evolutionary, or probabilistic theories, TNA operates at a logically prior level, identifying constraints that must hold for any system to continue existing at all.</p> <p>At its foundation lies the <em>Mother Theorem of Axiomatic Necessity</em>, which establishes that certain functional constraints are necessary before any dynamics, selection processes, or statistical descriptions can meaningfully apply. From this root, TNA derives a set of operators—axiomatic necessity (N1), global incoherence (ℵ), and discharge capacity (Ψ)—that govern collapse, persistence, and functional migration across physical, biological, cognitive, and social systems.</p> <p>Crucially, TNA is not purely logical. Recent results demonstrate a formal mapping from axiomatic necessity to measurable thermodynamic throughput, allowing Ψ to be expressed in physical units (W/K). This closes the theory as a constraint-based physical framework, specifying the minimum energetic cost of coherence in open systems.</p> <p>TNA should be evaluated not in terms of absolute truth or falsity, but by its domain of validity: the classes of systems it constrains correctly, and the persistent phenomena it renders tractable where existing models remain incomplete or ill-posed.</p> <p>Short video<br><br><a href="https://vimeo.com/1157961171?share=copy&amp;fl=sv&amp;fe=ci"> https://vimeo.com/1157961171?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=ci</a></p>