Guardat en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Idioma: | anglès |
| Publicat: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18174402 |
| Etiquetes: |
Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
Taula de continguts:
- <p>This paper introduces a unified structural framework for the realization limits of open systems, centered on the <strong>Aleph Equation</strong> and the <strong>Oniric Value Theorem</strong>. We propose that the operational openness of a system is not a function of instantaneous state, but a result of the historical accumulation of unrealized surplus. Formally, we define the <strong>Aleph Principle</strong>: a system remains operationally closed only as long as its cumulative surplus—the integral of generative capacity (<span>G</span>) minus control capacity (<span>Psi</span>)—does not exceed its maximum internal absorptive capacity (<span>\aleph_{\max}</span>).</p> <p>When this threshold is breached, the system undergoes a topological transition where closure becomes structurally impossible, forcing externalization through leakage, bifurcation, or emergence. Parallelly, we formalize the <strong>Oniric Value Theorem</strong> as the diagnostic criterion for this regime. It identifies "oniric value" as declared assets or capabilities that remain stable only while deferred; their attempted exercise triggers systemic degradation because the cumulative surplus has already reached the absorptive limit.</p> <p>By applying this dual framework to censorship regimes, cloud computing, and AI alignment, we demonstrate that systemic stability is often a consequence of non-exercise rather than genuine capacity. This synthesis provides a non-moral, measurable, and domain-independent diagnostic tool for distinguishing operational value from narrative value before irreversible structural commitment occurs.</p>