Furkejuvvon:
| Váldodahkki: | |
|---|---|
| Materiálatiipa: | Recurso digital |
| Giella: | |
| Almmustuhtton: |
Zenodo
2024
|
| Liŋkkat: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18220408 |
| Fáddágilkorat: |
Lasit fáddágilkoriid
Eai fáddágilkorat, Lasit vuosttaš fáddágilkora!
|
Sisdoallologahallan:
- <p>The concept of Atman is central to the Vedantic religious-philosophical thought. Vedanta Darsana is <br>also regarded as Atmadarsana. The Upanisads, also known as Vedanta Sruti, impart the teaching of <br>Atman (Atmavidya¯). Among the principal Upanisads, Kathoponisad is the most prominent one so far, <br>as far as Atman and its realisation are concerned. The concept of Atman has been elucidated through <br>the anecdote of Yama to Nachiketa. Also, there is the exploration of Atmajana or Atmopodobdhi while <br>exposing the Upanisadic concept of Atman in the background of the Advaita perspective. I have tried to <br>mention how the idea of Atman can be regarded as philosophically illuminating and how the comments <br>of the Upanishadic concept of Atman are all with obscure mysticism and thus transcendent to a <br>minimum sort of rational scrutiny can be avoided. By way of discussion, it seems to me to be entirely <br>plausible that the concept of Atman and its realisation becomes more comprehensible through an <br>ethical instead of theological rendering. </p>