Guardat en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Idioma: | |
| Publicat: |
Zenodo
2019
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18227462 |
| Etiquetes: |
Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
Taula de continguts:
- <p><a href="https://ijetrm.com/issues/files/Jan-2019-21-1768996887-DEC0201925.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Conflict-affected regions present</a> one of the most persistent constraints to inclusive economic development,<br>particularly in fragile states where insecurity, unemployment, and weak institutions reinforce cycles of poverty<br>and instability. Nigeria exemplifies this challenge at scale, with protracted conflicts disrupting agricultural<br>production, infrastructure investment, and private capital flows across several regions. At a macro level,<br>sustainable recovery in such contexts requires investment frameworks that move beyond short-term humanitarian<br>responses and instead align security objectives with livelihood creation and long-term economic stabilization.<br>This study positions integrated investment models as critical instruments for translating national development<br>priorities into locally resilient economic systems. Drawing on development finance, security economics, and<br>impact investment theory, the paper conceptualizes a multi-layered investment architecture capable of operating<br>under elevated risk conditions. It emphasizes blended finance structures, public–private risk-sharing mechanisms,<br>and performance-linked financing that internalize security externalities while crowding in private capital. At the<br>national scale, these models are framed to align with fiscal planning, decentralization policies, and sectoral<br>strategies in agriculture, energy, and small-scale manufacturing, ensuring coherence between regional<br>interventions and macroeconomic stabilization goals. The analysis then narrows to Nigeria’s conflict-affected<br>regions, proposing adaptive investment vehicles that integrate security provisioning, community-based<br>livelihoods, and market access within a single financial logic. Mechanisms such as security-backed guarantees,<br>local enterprise aggregation platforms, and outcomes-based funding are examined for their capacity to stabilize<br>incomes, reduce conflict incentives, and rebuild investor confidence. By structurally linking security outcomes to<br>economic returns, the proposed framework offers a scalable pathway for transforming fragile regions into<br>contributors to national growth, fiscal resilience, and social cohesion. Policy relevance is highlighted through<br>governance alignment, transparency safeguards, and impact indicators.</p>