Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Sprog: | |
| Udgivet: |
Zenodo
2019
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18332176 |
| Tags: |
Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
Indholdsfortegnelse:
- <p><b><i>Tenedia</i> Grishin, subgen. n.</b></p><p>http://zoobank.org/ 44F6F565-F53A-41E4-9296-BF804919F115</p><p><b>Type species:</b> <i>Emesis tenedia</i> C. & R. Felder, 1861.</p><p><b>Diagnosis.</b> A large subgenus without apparent synapomorphy. Characterized by generally broader wings than other <i>Emesis</i> (Fig. 2h). It is best diagnosed by the lack of characters for other subgenera. Differs from the nominotypical subgenus by the lack of metallic spots, from <i>Aphacitis</i> by the lack of apical white spots in females, from <i>Poeasia</i> (Fig. 2c) by the lack of broad gray semi-metallic areas on wings, from <i>Mandania</i> (Fig. 2b) by less bulky body, and from <i>Brimia</i> (Fig. 2d) by relatively larger hindwings. In DNA, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: nuclear genome: cne11306.1.2:T60A, cne5833.2.1:A108G, cne12476.6.1:A395G, cne18163.3.1: A186G, cne 2337.5.1:A603T; COI barcode region: T281R, T484M, G506A or G38A & T283A, and A520T.</p><p><b>Derivation of the name.</b> The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular. It is formed from the type species name.</p><p><b>pecies included:</b> <i>Emesis lupina melancholica</i> Stichel, 1916 (elevated to species level below), <i>Polystichtis ocypore</i> Geyer, 1837, <i>Emesis angularis</i> Hewitson, 1870, <i>Emesis sinuata</i> Hewitson, 1877, <i>Emesis heterochroa</i> Hopffer, 1874, <i>Emesis tenedia</i> C. & R. Felder, 1861, <i>Emesis saturata</i> Godman & Salvin, [1886], <i>Emesis cypria</i> C. & R. Felder, 1861, <i>Emesis tegula</i> Godman & Salvin, [1886], <i>Emesis lupina</i> Godman & Salvin, [1886], <i>Emesis toltec</i> Reakirt, 1866, <i>Apodemia phyciodoides</i> Barnes & Benjamin, 1924.</p><p><b>Parent taxon:</b> Genus <i>Emesis</i> Fabricius, 1807.</p><p>Next, our genomic analysis revealed that some species placed in <i>Emesis</i> do not belong in that genus. In agreement with morphological analysis of Hall & Harvey (2002), genomic phylogeny places <i>Emesis xanthosa</i> (Stichel, 1919) as a sister of <i>Sertania guttata</i> (Stichel, 1910), the type species of a genus described recently (Kaminski <i>et al</i>. 2017). The difference between COI barcodes of <i>E</i>. <i>xanthosa</i> and <i>Sertania guttata</i> is about 9%, similar to the difference of 8% between two genera <i>Lasaia</i> H. Bates, 1868 and <i>Calephelis</i> Grote & Robinson, 1869, but larger that the difference of 6.5% between two subgenera <i>Neoapodemia</i> Trujano, 2018 and <i>Plesioarida</i> Trujano & García, 2018. Therefore, similarly to Kaminski <i>et al</i>. (2017), we do not place <i>xanthosa</i> in <i>Sertania</i>, but a new genus is erected for it here.</p>