Guardat en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Idioma: | anglès |
| Publicat: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18440088 |
| Etiquetes: |
Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
Taula de continguts:
- <p>Contemporary debates about “agentic AI” are frequently framed around questions of metaphysical agency, moral status, or authorship. This article argues that such framings mislocate the central governance problem posed by contemporary AI systems. Artificial systems need not possess intention, consciousness, or authorship in order to exercise authority over others’ practical and epistemic environments. What matters instead are the structural conditions under which authority emerges through delegation. The article advances a threshold account of authority without authorship. It argues that AI systems acquire governance-relevant authority when four conditions converge in practice: delegated discretionary power, temporal persistence, infrastructural embedding within socio-technical systems, and non-exit by affected parties. Under these conditions, systems structure action, justification, and constraint in ways characteristic of authority, even while lacking authorship of evaluative standards. Responsibility and legitimacy therefore attach not to agency in a strong sense, but to the design and maintenance of delegation structures. Drawing on decision theory, infrastructure studies, and fiduciary theory, the article explains why existing AI governance frameworks—often premised on episodic oversight, reversibility, and downstream accountability—struggle under conditions of persistence, speed, and infrastructural integration. It concludes that authority without authorship constitutes a distinct and under-theorised challenge for philosophy of technology.</p>