Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Garcia Lachica, Heeber
Formato: Recurso digital
Idioma:inglês
Publicado em: Zenodo 2026
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18445493
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
_version_ 1866901918160257024
author Garcia Lachica, Heeber
author_facet Garcia Lachica, Heeber
contents <p>This preprint proposes a redefinition of traceability as a demonstrable and falsifiable property, rather than a feature, report, or compliance claim. While traceability is widely asserted across supply chains, manufacturing, healthcare, and logistics, most systems conflate it with tracking or record availability and fail under audit, recall, or litigation conditions.</p> <p>The paper introduces an axiomatic framework that defines the minimal conditions under which traceability can be said to exist. From these axioms, it derives validation tests capable of determining whether a given state is traceable, as well as forensic analysis procedures that identify the precise point, cause, and context of traceability failure.</p> <p>The framework is technology-neutral and applicable across sectors. It enables systems to explicitly distinguish between traceable and non-traceable states and to demonstrate, rather than merely claim, traceability over time. The work concludes that if a system cannot demonstrate where and why traceability fails, it never possessed traceability to begin with.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18445493
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle From Tracking to Demonstrable Traceability
Garcia Lachica, Heeber
Traceability
Tracking
Causality
Supply Chains
Validation
Forensic Analysis
Data Integrity
Requirements Traceability
<p>This preprint proposes a redefinition of traceability as a demonstrable and falsifiable property, rather than a feature, report, or compliance claim. While traceability is widely asserted across supply chains, manufacturing, healthcare, and logistics, most systems conflate it with tracking or record availability and fail under audit, recall, or litigation conditions.</p> <p>The paper introduces an axiomatic framework that defines the minimal conditions under which traceability can be said to exist. From these axioms, it derives validation tests capable of determining whether a given state is traceable, as well as forensic analysis procedures that identify the precise point, cause, and context of traceability failure.</p> <p>The framework is technology-neutral and applicable across sectors. It enables systems to explicitly distinguish between traceable and non-traceable states and to demonstrate, rather than merely claim, traceability over time. The work concludes that if a system cannot demonstrate where and why traceability fails, it never possessed traceability to begin with.</p>
title From Tracking to Demonstrable Traceability
topic Traceability
Tracking
Causality
Supply Chains
Validation
Forensic Analysis
Data Integrity
Requirements Traceability
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18445493