Shranjeno v:
| Glavni avtor: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Jezik: | angleščina |
| Izdano: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Teme: | |
| Online dostop: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18476992 |
| Oznake: |
Označite
Brez oznak, prvi označite!
|
Kazalo:
- <p><span>Recent revelations concerning the establishment of Chinese “overseas police service stations” have generated significant debate about the boundaries of sovereignty, the reach of domestic law enforcement beyond national territory, and the evolving practices of transnational repression. Drawing on open-source documents, investigative journalism, NGO reporting, government and parliamentary records, and existing scholarly literature, this article examines the origins, functions, and implications of these entities within a broader landscape of extra-territorial policing and informal governance. Rather than treating overseas police stations as anomalous or uniquely coercive, the analysis situates them within a spectrum of practices that include formal international cooperation mechanisms, consular activities, diaspora governance, and informal modes of influence that operate below traditional legal thresholds. The article develops a conceptual framework centred on informality, plausible deniability, and asymmetric power relations to explain why such practices can persist despite clear tensions with host-state sovereignty and international legal norms. Through comparative analysis of host-state responses and diaspora experiences, the study demonstrates how non-violent, service-oriented, and community-embedded practices may generate compliance without direct coercion, while simultaneously producing chilling effects and legal ambiguity. The article contributes to scholarship on transnational repression, global policing, and international law by highlighting how state power is increasingly exercised through hybrid and informal arrangements that challenge territorial assumptions without overtly breaching them. It concludes by identifying gaps in existing legal and governance frameworks and outlining policy dilemmas for liberal democracies confronted with post-territorial forms of policing.</span></p>