Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18517182 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>This paper establishes a boundary result concerning the misuse of fixed point theorems in closed admissible systems. It proves that fixed point constructions, when treated as generators of legitimacy, stability, or self-justification, function as standing traps: they appear to close a system by self-reference while illicitly importing external authority, hidden parameters, or deferred admissibility. Within a closed framework with conserved standing, fixed points are shown to be permissible only as descriptive artifacts under standing-preserving redescription, not as sources of admissibility or enforcement. The analysis is strictly eliminative and non-constructive: it introduces no new primitives, specifies no procedures, and provides no operational or mathematical prescriptions. The result functions as a boundary theorem, ruling out fixed point arguments as admissible foundations for closure, legitimacy, or self-grounding.</p>