Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18518022 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>This paper demonstrates that admissible re-description is possible only under strict non-contact between constraint envelopes. Once an envelope is fixed, re-descriptions may occur internally, but any attempt to transfer structure, justification, or constraints across envelopes is shown to violate admissibility.</p> <p>The analysis is eliminative and necessity-based. It shows that apparent cross-envelope reasoning—such as global coordination, shared parameters, or meta-level reconciliation—depends on illicit scope transport that is not licensed by any envelope. When envelope non-contact is enforced, only internal re-descriptions remain admissible, and these preserve standing without introducing new structure.</p> <p>The result explains why cross-domain unification fails when treated as contact between envelopes, while internal coherence remains intact. No procedures, mappings, or translation rules are provided. The paper records a hard boundary on admissible re-description that preserves the integrity of constraint envelopes and prevents hidden admissibility violations.</p>