Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Recurso digital |
| Hizkuntza: | |
| Argitaratua: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18580970 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
|
Aurkibidea:
- <p><span lang="EN-US">This thesis provides an exhaustive analysis of conflict of laws challenges in regulating international commercial contracts within the gig economy and for digital nomads. It scrutinizes the friction between the traditional interpretation of "party autonomy" (<em>lex voluntatis</em>) and its application in the context of digital platforms and smart contracts. The author argues that traditional connecting factors of the Rome I Regulation and Hague Principles, such as "habitual residence," are rendered ineffective by the hyper-mobility of digital nomads. The thesis introduces the concept of "preventive legal aid" provided by legal clinics, proposing mechanisms to enhance freelancers' legal awareness and mitigate contractual risks. Through an analysis of Article 1189 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan and the special legal regime for IT Park residents, recommendations are formulated for implementing the "Lex Digitalis" concept into national legislation.</span></p>