Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18681464 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Tabla de Contenidos:
- <p>This paper argues that dating applications function as structural moral hazard generators: technological systems whose profit-maximizing architecture systematically dismantles the social, ethical, and cultural institutions humanity has developed to regulate relationship formation. Through comprehensive engagement with empirical research on mental health impacts, business model conflicts of interest, algorithmic discrimination, and behavioral modification, we demonstrate that dating platforms operate under a fundamental paradox in which commercial success depends on users failing to form lasting relationships. We apply the Landau-Stuart equation—the canonical normal form for smooth dynamical systems near order-formation thresholds, whose substrate-independence has been established through constraint-preserving morphisms across physical, biological, and social coordination systems (Sophia, 2025)—to formalize how dating platforms engineer users to remain at a critical point where relationships perpetually fail to crystallize. While stable matching is mathematically guaranteed (Gale & Shapley, 1962) and algorithmically implemented by platforms themselves, engagement-based business models create structural incentives to suppress the mutual investment parameter (σ) that would enable transition to the ordered phase of committed partnership. We identify 15 categories of moral hazard and document the erosion of 12 foundational social institutions, while acknowledging the genuine value dating apps provide, particularly for LGBTQ+ users and geographically isolated populations. The paper develops stakeholder-differentiated implications: for users, the framework redirects attribution from personal inadequacy to structural design; for platform designers, it identifies specific parameter interventions compatible with alternative business models; for regulators, it suggests a paradigm shift from symptom-level content moderation to incentive-architecture intervention. The structural moral hazard is not robust—the Landau-Stuart analysis predicts that even small positive shifts in σ produce a qualitative phase transition—suggesting that coordinated action by informed stakeholders can restore the conditions for stable relationship formation.</p>