Đã lưu trong:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Recurso digital |
| Ngôn ngữ: | Tiếng Anh |
| Được phát hành: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18732016 |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
Mục lục:
- <p>This essay, <em>Animal Liberation After Aggregation: A Post-Singerian Defense of the Lexical Veto</em>, offers a critical structural revision of Peter Singer’s animal ethics. While acknowledging the historical significance of <em>Animal Liberation</em>, the author highlights a fundamental vulnerability in its aggregative approach: the theoretical possibility of sacrificing individuals for overall benefit. Introducing the concept of the <span><strong>Singer Limit</strong></span>, the paper argues that when suffering crosses the threshold of agency collapse (Smax), aggregation ceases to provide moral justification. By developing the notion of <span><strong>proto-agency</strong></span> and analyzing the systematic production of Smax in industrial animal farming, the work defends the <span><strong>Lexical Veto</strong></span> principle: no human benefit can justify the intentional infliction of extreme suffering on sentient beings. The essay establishes a post-Singerian framework that moves from aggregative reasoning to non-aggregative consequentialism, grounding abolitionist ethics in the structural recognition of individual separateness and moral addressability.</p>