Gardado en:
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Idioma: | |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Acceso en liña: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18764609 |
| Tags: |
Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>Phase-0 Stack v1.1 of the D10Z-MIZAN sovereign attestation system. <br>This release closes four open items from adversarial technical review <br>of v1.0 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18764295) and introduces ArbitrationReceipt <br>v1.0 as companion specification, resolving the supranodal gap (OI-4).</p> <p>── OracleReceipt_ΦW v1.1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────<br>Canonical cryptographic receipt for the water efficiency oracle.<br>14 mandatory fields · SHA3-256 chain · Ed25519 signature · 6 Commit Gates<br>(including new CG-2.5 Actor Validity Gate) · 10 falsifiers (F-R1–F-R10<br>+ F-BH-4) · AuditBundle.</p> <p>Four open items closed:<br>OI-1 — Actor Key Lifecycle: HSM governance, rotation period ≤365d,<br> Key Registry, CRL hash-chained, CG-2.5 gate at emission.<br>OI-2 — Ledger External Anchoring: 3-tier storage, daily Zenodo<br> snapshots, independent third-party verification protocol.<br>OI-3 — Canonical Serialization Standard (RFC-like): UTF-8 no BOM,<br> IEEE-754 fixed-4 decimals, UTC-Z mandatory, reference<br> implementation in pseudocode with test vectors.<br>OI-4 — ArbitrationReceipt dependency: resolved by companion document<br> (same release).</p> <p>phi_model stability rule formalized: any change to phi_component weights<br>MUST generate a new policy_id. Semantic integrity of historical receipts<br>guaranteed by PolicyRegistry append-only constraint.</p> <p>── ArbitrationReceipt v1.0 ─────────────────────────────────────────────<br>Supranodal dispute resolution layer. Closes OI-4. Companion to<br>OracleReceipt_ΦW v1.1.<br>12 mandatory fields · SHA3-256 chain · quorum Ed25519 (2-of-4 RESOLVED,<br>3-of-4 SYSTEM_HALT) · 5 active invariants · 9 falsifiers (F-A1–F-A8<br>+ F-BH-4).</p> <p>Invariants: DETERMINISTIC_REPLAY · ATTESTATION_DEPTH ·<br>TIMESTAMP_CANONICAL · CORRUPTED_NODE · SYSTEM_HALT.<br>(STAKE_WEIGHTED: Phase-1 only — rejected by CA-3 Phase Gate in Phase-0.)</p> <p>resolution_fn() proven properties:<br>P1 — Idempotency: same inputs always produce same output.<br>P2 — Commutativity: result invariant to node labeling A/B.<br>P3 — Termination: finite if-else tree, no recursion, always returns.<br>P4 — Total Order: SHA3-256 lexicographic fallback eliminates ties.</p> <p>6-case adversarial conflict model fully covered:<br>(1) both valid desynchronized · (2) one corrupted · (3) both corrupted<br>→ SYSTEM_HALT · (4) deliberate fork → forensic + SYSTEM_HALT<br>· (5) latency-induced · (6) cross-border replay.</p> <p>SYSTEM_HALT is terminal and clean: not "impossibility of collapse"<br>but "fails safely with bounded, auditable, escalated terminal state."</p> <p>── Scope ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────<br>Both documents formalize cryptographic infrastructure only.<br>Geopolitical deployment strategy, historical-semantic convergence<br>(MAZUN→MIZAN, 3,000-year chain), and sovereign adoption frameworks<br>are explicitly out of scope. They are addressed in separate deposits<br>(see related resources). The cryptographic layer is neutral and<br>independently auditable regardless of deployment context.</p> <p>── ZIP contents ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────<br>ORACLE_RECEIPT_PHI_W_v1_1_FINAL.docx — Oracle layer specification<br>ARBITRATION_RECEIPT_v1_0_FINAL.docx — Arbitration layer specification<br>CHANGELOG_v1_0_TO_v1_1.md — Explicit diff, all corrections</p>