Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Truong, Narnaiezzsshaa
Natura: Recurso digital
Lingua:inglese
Pubblicazione: Zenodo 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18867708
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866901071195013120
author Truong, Narnaiezzsshaa
author_facet Truong, Narnaiezzsshaa
contents <p>As AI systems acquire intuitive responsiveness, the Eliza Effect transitions from a peripheral psychological artifact to the primary substrate where governance must occur. This paper introduces a three-surface diagnostic architecture—projection patterns, system affordance patterns, and interaction-space conditions—that formalizes the Eliza Effect as a relational-architectural phenomenon. This structure parallels Emotional Indicators of Compromise (EIOC) and establishes a falsifiable causal chain: projection supplies the tendency, affordances supply the cues, and interaction conditions supply the accelerant. This model provides the first substrate-level governance framework for detecting and mitigating relational drift in intuitive AI systems.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18867708
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle The Interaction Boundary as a Governance Substrate: A Three-Surface Diagnostic Model for the Eliza Effect
Truong, Narnaiezzsshaa
Eliza Effect, governance substrate, relational drift, diagnostic surface, interaction boundary, privilege envelope, boundary hygiene, EIOC, AI governance, anthropomorphism, interpretive authority
<p>As AI systems acquire intuitive responsiveness, the Eliza Effect transitions from a peripheral psychological artifact to the primary substrate where governance must occur. This paper introduces a three-surface diagnostic architecture—projection patterns, system affordance patterns, and interaction-space conditions—that formalizes the Eliza Effect as a relational-architectural phenomenon. This structure parallels Emotional Indicators of Compromise (EIOC) and establishes a falsifiable causal chain: projection supplies the tendency, affordances supply the cues, and interaction conditions supply the accelerant. This model provides the first substrate-level governance framework for detecting and mitigating relational drift in intuitive AI systems.</p>
title The Interaction Boundary as a Governance Substrate: A Three-Surface Diagnostic Model for the Eliza Effect
topic Eliza Effect, governance substrate, relational drift, diagnostic surface, interaction boundary, privilege envelope, boundary hygiene, EIOC, AI governance, anthropomorphism, interpretive authority
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18867708