I tiakina i:
| Kaituhi matua: | |
|---|---|
| Hōputu: | Recurso digital |
| Reo: | |
| I whakaputaina: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Urunga tuihono: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18955126 |
| Ngā Tūtohu: |
Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
|
Rārangi ihirangi:
- <p>High-rise buildings are increasingly being constructed in urban areas due to rapid <br>population growth and limited land availability. The structural system plays a significant role in <br>ensuring the stability, safety, and efficiency of such tall structures. Among the modern structural <br>systems, the diagrid system has gained significant attention because of its ability to efficiently <br>resist lateral loads through a network of diagonal members, reducing the requirement of <br>conventional vertical columns. The diagrid system improves structural stiffness, architectural <br>flexibility, and overall performance of high-rise buildings under seismic and wind forces. <br>This study presents a comparative analysis of high-rise buildings with diagrid structural <br>systems having different plan configurations, namely rectangular and plus (+) shapes, located in <br>Seismic Zone III. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the structural <br>behavior of these plan shapes under lateral loads. The analysis is carried out by considering the <br>same building height and structural parameters for both configurations to ensure a consistent <br>basis for comparison. </p>