I tiakina i:
| Kaituhi matua: | |
|---|---|
| Hōputu: | Recurso digital |
| Reo: | |
| I whakaputaina: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Urunga tuihono: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19019596 |
| Ngā Tūtohu: |
Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
|
Rārangi ihirangi:
- <p>There is a general consensus among both the public and the scientific community that there is a need to move away from food systems focused on chemical pesticides (Aktar et al, 2009; Bakker et al, 2021; Chagnon et al, 2015; Koehler & Triebskorn, 2013; Mustafa et al, 2021; Sharma et al, 2019, 2020; Tang et al, 2021, 2022; Wuepper et al, 2023). At the Fifteenth Meeting of the Parties to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (COP15), the EU and all EU Member States adopted the historic Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework1 and set themselves the globally binding target of "reducing the overall risk from pesticides and highly hazardous chemicals by at least half by 2030, including through integrated pest management (IPM), based on science, taking into account food security and livelihoods''.</p> <p><br>Future strategies and policies need to be developed to reduce the use and risks of pesticides, supporting agricultural production and food security and encouraging the development and adoption of sustainable practices.</p> <p><br>The SUPPORT analyses why adoption of IPM and low pesticide input practices is lagging behind objectives and expectations. The project creates solutions by building on an RRI approach, in particular referring to the analysis of the barriers and opportunities in the external environment, which need to be matched with the understanding of the reasons why farmers and growers decide to apply IPM, low-risk pesticide use practices or rely on chemical pesticide use. This matching process creates a basis for the development of strategies to enable and support individual farmers to apply IPM and to make their crop protection management more sustainable. It will help them to make use of the existing opportunities. Furthermore, it creates the basis for the development of strategies and policies at the level of systems, landscape and rural areas to remove barriers, to create new opportunities and to enable farmer systems to adopt IPM and low-risk pesticide use practices at a larger scale. Finally, it provides the basis for adjustment of crop protection policies at member state and EU level.</p> <p><br>WP3 SUPPORT ‘Policy and strategy analysis and design’ aims to develop the strategies and policy recommendations in co-creation with actors in a transdisciplinary multi-actor approach. AUA has developed the D3.1 “Policy Analysis” report, which reviews existing IPM strategic and policy framework to identify policy gaps and needs at EU and across selected Member States level.</p>