Сохранить в:
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Recurso digital |
| Язык: | английский |
| Опубликовано: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19081596 |
| Метки: |
Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
| _version_ | 1866901697504215040 |
|---|---|
| author | Yumasultanov, Rinat |
| author_facet | Yumasultanov, Rinat |
| contents | <p>This study presents a simulation-based exploration of governability under conditions of persistent, low-intensity disturbance. Rather than focusing on discrete crises, the model conceptualizes governance as a constrained decision-processing system operating under continuous inflow of demands, bounded capacity, and delayed feedback.</p> <p>The framework introduces <em>decision load</em> as a central state variable capturing backlog accumulation, escalation dynamics, and workload exceeding processing capacity. Governance performance is analyzed through a stylized system dynamics model comparing three architectural regimes: high-latency periodic review, unconditional fast intervention, and adaptive low-latency control guided by a governance-load metric (IEKV).</p> <p>Simulation results reveal several structural insights. First, governance degradation emerges endogenously through cumulative decision load rather than exogenous shocks. Second, governance-level congestion indicators precede observable deterioration in welfare outcomes, suggesting their potential role as early warning signals. Third, maximal responsiveness does not guarantee superior performance: unconditional high-frequency intervention generates rising coordination costs and control inefficiencies. In contrast, adaptive architectures that condition responsiveness on system load achieve more stable long-term outcomes by balancing responsiveness and control effort.</p> <p>The model is intentionally minimal and not designed for empirical forecasting. Its contribution is methodological: to demonstrate how feedback latency, decision queues, escalation mechanisms, and control costs jointly shape governability under sustained disturbance. The framework provides a tractable basis for further empirical operationalization using observable administrative indicators such as backlog size, response latency, escalation rates, and coordination complexity.</p> <p>The results suggest that the ability to manage decision load may constitute a fundamental dimension of systemic resilience in complex governance environments.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19081596 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | The Dynamics of Governability: Decision Load, Feedback Latency, and the Limits of Continuous Control Yumasultanov, Rinat system dynamics governance modelling decision queues feedback delay simulation experiment decision load resilience under disturbance <p>This study presents a simulation-based exploration of governability under conditions of persistent, low-intensity disturbance. Rather than focusing on discrete crises, the model conceptualizes governance as a constrained decision-processing system operating under continuous inflow of demands, bounded capacity, and delayed feedback.</p> <p>The framework introduces <em>decision load</em> as a central state variable capturing backlog accumulation, escalation dynamics, and workload exceeding processing capacity. Governance performance is analyzed through a stylized system dynamics model comparing three architectural regimes: high-latency periodic review, unconditional fast intervention, and adaptive low-latency control guided by a governance-load metric (IEKV).</p> <p>Simulation results reveal several structural insights. First, governance degradation emerges endogenously through cumulative decision load rather than exogenous shocks. Second, governance-level congestion indicators precede observable deterioration in welfare outcomes, suggesting their potential role as early warning signals. Third, maximal responsiveness does not guarantee superior performance: unconditional high-frequency intervention generates rising coordination costs and control inefficiencies. In contrast, adaptive architectures that condition responsiveness on system load achieve more stable long-term outcomes by balancing responsiveness and control effort.</p> <p>The model is intentionally minimal and not designed for empirical forecasting. Its contribution is methodological: to demonstrate how feedback latency, decision queues, escalation mechanisms, and control costs jointly shape governability under sustained disturbance. The framework provides a tractable basis for further empirical operationalization using observable administrative indicators such as backlog size, response latency, escalation rates, and coordination complexity.</p> <p>The results suggest that the ability to manage decision load may constitute a fundamental dimension of systemic resilience in complex governance environments.</p> |
| title | The Dynamics of Governability: Decision Load, Feedback Latency, and the Limits of Continuous Control |
| topic | system dynamics governance modelling decision queues feedback delay simulation experiment decision load resilience under disturbance |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19081596 |