Збережено в:
| Автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Recurso digital |
| Мова: | |
| Опубліковано: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19199242 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
Зміст:
- <p>The Scanning Kinematics derivation showed that the brane equation of motion (□<span>g</span>Ξ = 0) admits both static and propagating solutions, and that INFLOW acts as the boundary condition selecting the propagating branch. INFLOW was left as <span>[P-nova] </span>— a hypothesis, not a derivation.</p> <p>This document attempts to derive INFLOW from the existing EDC postulates P2 (thick brane, S<span>1</span><span>ξ </span>compact) and P3 (ρ<span>5</span>M<span>≫ρ</span>4<span>M</span>). The central argument: P3 creates an asymmetric pressure across the brane in the ξ direction. Since the brane’s normal is ∂/∂ξ and S<span>1</span><span>ξ </span>is compact, this pressure gradient drives perpetual motion of the brane along S<span>1</span><span>ξ </span>— which is INFLOW.</p> <p>If successful, the entire scanning chain upgrades from <span>[Der]</span>|<span>[P-nova] </span>to <span>[Der]</span>|P, and Paper 12 reduces to three postulates (P1, P2, P3) →four forces.</p>