Gardado en:
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Acceso en liña: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19259861 |
| Tags: |
Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!
|
| _version_ | 1866901232662085632 |
|---|---|
| author | Bruhacs, Lorand |
| author_facet | Bruhacs, Lorand |
| contents | <p>Some transcendental regimes fail to collapse to a least admissible core and yet do not become merely weak. Communicative rationality exhibits that more interesting possibility. In a restricted finitary discourse fragment, iterated self-applicative discourse closure stabilizes to a canonical least self-answering repair, and when that repair is public-essential it cannot remain private: it projects to a recovered public boundary.</p> <p>The argument shows that stabilized discourse edges factor canonically through the public one-hole boundary of the communicative polynomial; that reciprocal role-symmetry and distributed scorekeeping generically obstruct presentation-initiality; that on the singleton-edge reflexive subcategory, repair approximation and public articulation are opposite presentations of the same stabilized public condition; and that, once strict collapse fails, the induced public closure fixes the recovered boundary itself. The philosophical payoff is a distinct transcendental form: communicative rationality can be reflexive-public rather than strict-initial, so the surviving edge is a genuine public interface rather than an accidental remainder.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19259861 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Discourse as Public Interface: Reflexive Closure in Communicative Rationality Bruhacs, Lorand transcendental pragmatics discourse ethics transcendental arguments Karl-Otto Apel communicative rationality public reason category theory polynomial functors fixed points <p>Some transcendental regimes fail to collapse to a least admissible core and yet do not become merely weak. Communicative rationality exhibits that more interesting possibility. In a restricted finitary discourse fragment, iterated self-applicative discourse closure stabilizes to a canonical least self-answering repair, and when that repair is public-essential it cannot remain private: it projects to a recovered public boundary.</p> <p>The argument shows that stabilized discourse edges factor canonically through the public one-hole boundary of the communicative polynomial; that reciprocal role-symmetry and distributed scorekeeping generically obstruct presentation-initiality; that on the singleton-edge reflexive subcategory, repair approximation and public articulation are opposite presentations of the same stabilized public condition; and that, once strict collapse fails, the induced public closure fixes the recovered boundary itself. The philosophical payoff is a distinct transcendental form: communicative rationality can be reflexive-public rather than strict-initial, so the surviving edge is a genuine public interface rather than an accidental remainder.</p> |
| title | Discourse as Public Interface: Reflexive Closure in Communicative Rationality |
| topic | transcendental pragmatics discourse ethics transcendental arguments Karl-Otto Apel communicative rationality public reason category theory polynomial functors fixed points |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19259861 |