Guardat en:
| Autors principals: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Idioma: | |
| Publicat: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Accés en línia: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19316870 |
| Etiquetes: |
Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
Taula de continguts:
- <p>Examination environments across Pakistan's university-affiliated college sector are designed to</p> <p>uphold fairness, integrity, and student dignity. However, systemic gaps in invigilation</p> <p>governance including absent standardized procedures, limited invigilator training, and</p> <p>inadequate accountability mechanisms allow arbitrary administrative practices to persist</p> <p>unchecked, harming student performance and psychological well-being. This mixed-methods</p> <p>study investigates repeated, unjustified search practices and documentation checks during formal</p> <p>examinations, documenting their ethical and procedural implications within Pakistan's broader</p> <p>examination governance framework. Data were gathered through structured observation, a</p> <p>student survey (n=18), and anonymized peer testimonies, analyzed thematically alongside</p> <p>existing literature. Findings confirm that arbitrary searches induce anxiety, erode institutional</p> <p>trust, and contravene procedural justice principles. Evidence-based recommendations include</p> <p>pre-examination verification protocols, standardized invigilator SOPs, and accessible grievance</p> <p>mechanisms to safeguard student dignity and strengthen sector-wide accountability.</p>