Сохранить в:
| Главные авторы: | , , |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Recurso digital |
| Язык: | английский |
| Опубликовано: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19361473 |
| Метки: |
Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
Оглавление:
- <p><strong>Episode summary:</strong> We often measure the health of civilization through narrow financial metrics like GDP, but as the gap between market value and human well-being widens, the need for a fundamental re-architecture of our economy becomes undeniable. This episode dives deep into the world of post-capitalist frameworks, moving beyond the extraction-based status quo toward models that prioritize circulation, resilience, and generative ownership. We explore real-world examples like the Preston Model and Mondragon Corporation to see how local anchor institutions and worker cooperatives are already keeping wealth within communities rather than letting it leak into global markets. By examining the potential of a resource-based economy and the shift from product ownership to service-based utility, we ask what happens when we de-commodify survival through universal basic services. Join us as we imagine a future where technology and data replace speculative bubbles, turning the global economy into a sustainable ecosystem focused on stewardship rather than perpetual growth.</p> <h3>Show Notes</h3> <p>The modern economic landscape is defined by a widening disconnect. While traditional indicators like the stock market and GDP may suggest prosperity, the lived experience of the average person tells a different story—one of housing crises, rising debt, and the increasing cost of basic existence. This friction suggests that the current financial architecture, which prioritizes extraction and quarterly growth, may no longer be fit for the challenges of the 21st century.</p> <p>### The Shift to Community Wealth Building One of the most practical alternatives to market-driven extraction is Community Wealth Building. This model focuses on keeping wealth circulating within a local ecosystem rather than allowing it to be siphoned off by multinational corporations. A primary example of this is the "Preston Model," where large "anchor institutions"—such as local hospitals, universities, and city councils—commit to spending their budgets locally.</p> <p>By prioritizing local suppliers and worker-owned cooperatives, these institutions ensure that the surplus value created by labor stays in the community. This approach treats the economy as a self-sustaining loop rather than a leaky bucket. Results have shown that this shift can lead to higher employment growth and more resilient local high streets by valuing social impact alongside the bottom line.</p> <p>### Redefining Ownership and Value Transitioning away from public valuations and stock markets requires a rethink of ownership. Worker-owned cooperatives, such as the Mondragon Corporation in Spain, offer a blueprint for this. In these structures, there are no outside shareholders demanding dividends. Instead, the workers themselves decide how to reinvest profits, whether through higher wages, better equipment, or community projects.</p> <p>This shifts the core motive of a business from individual profit to collective well-being. It also addresses the issue of "externalities"—the environmental and social costs that traditional markets often ignore. In a cooperative or community-centered model, the health of the environment and the workers is a primary concern, not a secondary cost to be minimized.</p> <p>### Resource-Based and Circular Economies Looking toward a global scale, the conversation moves into the territory of resource-based and circular economies. Current market signals are often inefficient at reflecting true scarcity or environmental impact. A resource-based economy suggests using real-time data and artificial intelligence to manage the distribution of goods based on actual human needs and resource availability, rather than speculative trading.</p> <p>This is complemented by the circular economy, which shifts from selling products to providing services. For example, instead of buying light bulbs, a consumer might buy the service of "illumination." When a company retains ownership of the hardware, they are incentivized to build products that last forever rather than practicing planned obsolescence. This aligns financial success with stewardship and resource efficiency.</p> <p>### De-commodifying Survival The final pillar of this re-architecture is the concept of Universal Basic Services. By providing essential requirements—such as housing, transit, internet, and food—free at the point of use, society can effectively de-commodify survival.</p> <p>When an individual's basic needs are met independently of the labor market, the power dynamic of the economy shifts. Work becomes a way to contribute to society rather than a desperate necessity for survival. This move simplifies the social architecture by removing the massive administrative overhead required to manage debt and payments for basic human rights, paving the way for a steady-state economy focused on quality of life.</p> <p>Listen online: <a href="https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/post-capitalist-economic-design">https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/post-capitalist-economic-design</a></p>