Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19432021 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866901867761500160 |
|---|---|
| author | Medesani, Massimo Macdonald, Jake |
| author_facet | Medesani, Massimo Macdonald, Jake |
| contents | <p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>This appendix formalises the transition from structural coherence to applicable governance within the <em>Beyond Containment 4.0</em> geometric framework for AGI–human symbiosis. It introduces the <strong>Independent Admissibility Mode (IAM)</strong> — a mapping IAM: M × C → {0,1} that evaluates admissibility at the precise moment of constraint, using an externally anchored, non‑reconstructible reference set EadmEadm that includes the lower physical bound c0<sub>o</sub>, the biological baseline ℓbio<sub>o</sub>, the scale conjugation constant Λ, and a finite prediction horizon ττ. The IAM enforces structural refusal: any state failing the test induces an irreversible halt, irrespective of the coherence parameter Γ.</p> <p>The <strong>Governance Applicability Level (GAL)</strong> operationalises the IAM through an adjudication protocol, a continuous audit mechanism, and a feedback loop that updates ΓΓ upon refusal. A central theorem demonstrates that the GAL is free of continuity bias: no trajectory can follow the sequence OBSERVE → EVALUATE → CONTINUE without passing through a fresh IAM verification. The invariant “no path of persistence without re‑encountered admissibility” is preserved even when audit or feedback cycles dominate.</p> <p>Six explicit falsification criteria are provided, grounding the framework in empirical testability. A claim sheet summarises the geometric invariants, and a comprehensive worldwide bibliography (including minor works) supports the theoretical foundations. The appendix thereby completes the normative closure of the geometric framework, ensuring that descriptive coherence is transformed into a verifiable, bias‑free governance regime.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19432021 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Appendix Extension, IAM + GAL Closure Patch (Execution-Bound Admissibility) Medesani, Massimo Macdonald, Jake <p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>This appendix formalises the transition from structural coherence to applicable governance within the <em>Beyond Containment 4.0</em> geometric framework for AGI–human symbiosis. It introduces the <strong>Independent Admissibility Mode (IAM)</strong> — a mapping IAM: M × C → {0,1} that evaluates admissibility at the precise moment of constraint, using an externally anchored, non‑reconstructible reference set EadmEadm that includes the lower physical bound c0<sub>o</sub>, the biological baseline ℓbio<sub>o</sub>, the scale conjugation constant Λ, and a finite prediction horizon ττ. The IAM enforces structural refusal: any state failing the test induces an irreversible halt, irrespective of the coherence parameter Γ.</p> <p>The <strong>Governance Applicability Level (GAL)</strong> operationalises the IAM through an adjudication protocol, a continuous audit mechanism, and a feedback loop that updates ΓΓ upon refusal. A central theorem demonstrates that the GAL is free of continuity bias: no trajectory can follow the sequence OBSERVE → EVALUATE → CONTINUE without passing through a fresh IAM verification. The invariant “no path of persistence without re‑encountered admissibility” is preserved even when audit or feedback cycles dominate.</p> <p>Six explicit falsification criteria are provided, grounding the framework in empirical testability. A claim sheet summarises the geometric invariants, and a comprehensive worldwide bibliography (including minor works) supports the theoretical foundations. The appendix thereby completes the normative closure of the geometric framework, ensuring that descriptive coherence is transformed into a verifiable, bias‑free governance regime.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> |
| title | Appendix Extension, IAM + GAL Closure Patch (Execution-Bound Admissibility) |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19432021 |