Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19632086 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>This paper examines whether superconductivity offers a useful cross-scale analog for the SP3<br>(space-phase) interpretation of orbital motion. In the SP3 framework, motion is not treated as the<br>passive response of a body moving through empty space, but as transport within a structured<br>medium capable of conditioning, memory, and directional pressure coupling. Repeated motion is<br>proposed to organize that medium into coherence corridors that stabilize later motion, while an<br>external pressure field provides the asymmetrical drive that sustains forward transport.<br>Superconductivity presents an instructive comparison because it likewise combines a mediumdefined pathway, a mechanism that suppresses deviation from that pathway, and sustained<br>motion under an applied field with minimal dissipation. The analogy does not claim identity<br>between quantum superconductivity and macroscopic orbital behavior. Rather, it highlights a<br>shared structural logic: coherent transport can arise when a medium organizes motion, preserves<br>pathway integrity, and reduces losses. Framed in this way, superconductivity becomes a<br>conceptual aid for SP3, supporting the broader proposal that pathway formation, guided<br>transport, and resistance suppression may be general features of organized physical media across<br>widely separated scales.</p>