Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19655759 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>This white paper presents the Quantized Dimensional Ledger (QDL) as a representational admissibility framework and roadmap for applying dimensional closure as a pre-empirical structural filter across physical theories. The central idea is that many longstanding foundational problems persist not only because of missing data or incomplete dynamics, but because prevailing frameworks permit representational structures that are dimensionally unconstrained, internally unstable, or non-admissible under repeated composition and iteration.</p> <p>QDL replaces the conventional mass–length–time basis with a ledger built from length and frequency primitives together with a discrete geometric invariant, the Quantized Dimensional Cell (QDC). Within this framework, physically admissible quantities must be representable as integer combinations of ledger primitives without fractional tilings of the QDC. The paper develops QDL as a pre-empirical filter on representation space and uses it to organize twenty major challenge domains—including quantum gravity, vacuum energy, cosmological acceleration, mass hierarchies, the measurement problem, precision observables, and cross-domain recurrence—within a common structural grammar.</p> <p>The main text is intentionally framed as a roadmap white paper rather than as a completed phenomenological resolution of those challenges. Its purpose is to delineate a constrained space of admissible representations, identify common structural failure modes, and articulate explicit routes to falsification. A comprehensive technical companion, provided as Online Resource 1 / Supplementary Information, contains appendices A–T with detailed derivations, closure proofs, operator admissibility constraints, cosmological sketches, measurement analyses, and challenge-specific falsifiability tests.</p> <p>The paper does not claim that all twenty challenges are solved in the phenomenological sense within the main text. Its claim is narrower and structural: QDL supplies a common admissibility grammar within which many otherwise disconnected problem domains can be reformulated, compared, and tested.</p>