Uloženo v:
| Hlavní autor: | |
|---|---|
| Médium: | Recurso digital |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Témata: | |
| On-line přístup: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19698529 |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
Obsah:
- <p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span>Modern systems do not operate on reality but on interpretation.</span></strong><span> <strong>Because reality is not a defined, validated, or operationalized variable, instability emerges across all domains.</strong> This absence of a <strong>reality‑validation function</strong> produces a four‑fold blind gap: (1) <strong>Theory does not know the gap</strong> because it presupposes reality without defining it; (2) <strong>Practice cannot name the gap</strong> because it experiences symptoms without access to the underlying cause; (3) <strong>AI research does not see the gap</strong> because models process patterns, not reality; (4) <strong>Systems cannot measure the gap</strong> because reality is not a system variable.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>As a result, decisions become unstable, communication breaks, organizations lose orientation, processes drift, and AI systems hallucinate. All these phenomena share a single structural cause: <strong>the absence of a reality‑validation architecture</strong>.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>PREA introduces the first complete Theory–Practice–AI architecture by establishing reality as a <strong>system variable</strong>.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>It does so by <strong>defining reality</strong>, <strong>validating premises</strong>, and <strong>operationalizing reality</strong>, thereby stabilizing systems across domains.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span>This paper closes the circle initiated with the identification of the structural argumentation gap in Lehmann (2026). With the completion of the PREA architecture, the discipline is concluded.</span></p>