Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19770872 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p><span>This report analyzes </span><span>Ternary Logic (TL)</span><span> as a comprehensive computational governance architecture for high-stakes automated decision-making systems, evaluating its capacity to operate across software, hardware, and institutional layers. The foundational innovation—the </span><span>Epistemic Hold (0) state</span><span>—enables structured uncertainty management through formal computational hesitation, physically realized via </span><span>Delay Insensitive Ternary Logic (DITL)</span><span> hardware. Drawing on technical documentation from the TernaryLogic framework, peer-reviewed DITL circuit research, and hardware implementation studies, this analysis assesses whether native triadic computational architectures (+1, 0, −1) can serve as enforceable governance mechanisms for financial infrastructure, supply chain verification, regulatory compliance automation, and advanced artificial intelligence systems. The evaluation encompasses semiconductor feasibility, formal verification methodologies, failure mode analysis, and comparative assessment against alternative governance approaches including blockchain systems, trusted execution environments, and pure software governance. Key findings indicate that </span><span>TL's hardware-enforced hesitation, combined with tri-cameral institutional oversight and immutable evidentiary architectures, yields a constitutional substrate robust under recursive self-improvement and decentralized intelligence scenarios</span><span>.</span></p>