Saved in:
| Hovedforfatter: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Sprog: | engelsk |
| Udgivet: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19811986 |
| Tags: |
Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
Indholdsfortegnelse:
- Canon² — Trust Layer Research Archive. The Lume programming language was designed as a deterministic natural-language compiler whose canonical architecture—formalized across a 42-paper research corpus—establishes the foundational principles of intent-resolving compilation, certificate-anchored execution, and self-sustaining runtime behavior. As the ecosystem has grown to encompass autonomous software governance (GUPAS), multi-agent coordination (DAIGS), zero-knowledge state reversal, synthetic organism taxonomies, and distributed deterministic cognition, the canonical architecture has approached the boundary of its original design envelope. New capabilities demanded by the expansion research program—autonomous intent generation, cross-vertical governance, organism-level behavioral evolution, and privacy-preserving execution auditing—require architectural extensions that cannot be accommodated within the canonical 42 without disturbing their internal coherence and immutability guarantees. I introduce the Lume Doctrine Expansion Subsystems, a structured architectural framework comprising six modular subsystems—Intent Expansion (IES), Semantic Expansion (SES), Cognitive Expansion (CES), Execution Expansion (EES), Governance Expansion (GES), and Organism Expansion (OES)—that extend Lume's capabilities beyond canonical boundaries while preserving strict doctrinal continuity. Each expansion subsystem possesses its own identity certificate, deterministic boundaries, interoperability contracts, and governance lifecycle, ensuring that expansions are first-class citizens within the Trust Layer Certificate Fabric rather than ad hoc extensions bolted onto the canonical architecture. I formalize the integration architecture that binds these subsystems to GUPAS, Trust Layer, Lume-V, DAIGS, LDIR, and SOR, establishing clear interface contracts and deterministic composition guarantees. To my knowledge, this paper presents the first unified doctrine-expansion architecture for a deterministic natural-language programming ecosystem, providing the structural foundation for ecosystem-scale growth without doctrinal fragmentation.