I tiakina i:
| Kaituhi matua: | |
|---|---|
| Hōputu: | Recurso digital |
| Reo: | Ingarihi |
| I whakaputaina: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Ngā marau: | |
| Urunga tuihono: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19858095 |
| Ngā Tūtohu: |
Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
|
Rārangi ihirangi:
- <p>This record provides the preprint and reproduction package for the study "Evidence for a Structured Token-Generation System in the Voynich Manuscript."</p> <p>The study tests whether Voynich Manuscript tokens can be modeled by a structured prefix–core–suffix (PCS) token-generation system rather than by random processes. Using the Zandbergen–Landini EVA transcription (ZL3b), the analysis evaluates token matching, coverage, Zipf distribution alignment, fixed-length validation, bootstrap significance, holdout generalization, inter-token transition entropy, morphological family structure, positional dependency, and compression-based structural regularity.</p> <p>Key results include:</p> <p>- Matching Rate: PCS 97.02% vs Random 5.07%<br>- Token Coverage: PCS 85.25% vs Random 18.50%<br>- Zipf Slope Difference: PCS 0.0795 vs Random 0.7138<br>- H(suffix | core): 0.8746<br>- Transition entropy reduction: 0.2504 bits<br>- Compression ratios: real 0.3089, shuffled 0.3240, PCS-generated 0.3163<br>- Morphological families: 767 core-sharing families and 1,017 suffix-alternating clusters<br>- Positional chi-square: prefix = 4554.31, core = 17993.46, suffix = 3329.07</p> <p>The results support a structured token-generation mechanism but do not constitute semantic decipherment.</p>