Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| Publicado em: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19868191 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
Sumário:
- <p>Modern payment systems are frequently described as enabling real-time and final settlement. While this description is technically accurate, it is regulatorily incomplete.<br>Anti-money laundering (AML), sanctions enforcement, and fraud prevention introduce a persistent possibility of post-execution intervention. As a result, the economic out-<br>come of a transaction remains uncertain even after its technical completion. This paper develops a structural framework distinguishing between execution and<br>compliance closure. It introduces the concept of conditional settlement finality and shows that it arises across all major payment architectures, including correspondent<br>banking, instant payment systems, and stablecoin-based infrastructures. The analysis demonstrates that improvements in execution speed do not eliminate uncertainty. In-stead, they relocate it into the compliance layer. Settlement finality is therefore not an intrinsic system property, but a contingent state dependent on the closure of regulatory processes.</p>