Furkejuvvon:
| Váldodahkki: | |
|---|---|
| Materiálatiipa: | Recurso digital |
| Giella: | |
| Almmustuhtton: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Fáttát: | |
| Liŋkkat: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19905612 |
| Fáddágilkorat: |
Lasit fáddágilkoriid
Eai fáddágilkorat, Lasit vuosttaš fáddágilkora!
|
Sisdoallologahallan:
- <p>Paper 151 extracts the accounting ghost coefficient in the high-vorticity Navier-Stokes bridge. This coefficient measures whether positive vortex stretching survives only because of bookkeeping failures, such as unassigned stretching, double-counting, threshold gaps, transfer debt loss, stopping-time resets, support-exchange debt loss, or failure of the global ledger to reconcile. The paper shows that this coefficient is not a new physical fluid mechanism. It is a ledger coefficient.</p> <p>The main result is that the accounting ghost coefficient is exactly zero when the exact accounting repair package holds. This repair package requires every positive-stretching contribution to be assigned to a declared non-ghost route, every overlap to be removed or charged elsewhere, every threshold band to be assigned, every route-transfer debt to carry forward, every stopping-time constant to remain in a cumulative ledger, every support-exchange debt to carry forward, and the global ledger to reconcile. Under these conditions, all ghost components vanish, so the accounting ghost route is zero and the effective ghost coefficient is zero.</p> <p>The paper also adds safeguards against hidden failures. It treats soft stopping-time resets, support handoff losses, missing external charges, and limit-process ghosts as explicit failure modes. If exact repair fails, the coefficient must be reclassified as finite explicit, interval-bounded, symbolic finite, unknown, or obstructive. Thus Paper 151 removes one bookkeeping liability from the final margin audit while leaving the genuine analytic coefficients for later extraction.</p>