Kaydedildi:
| Yazar: | |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | Recurso digital |
| Dil: | İngilizce |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20004042 |
| Etiketler: |
Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
|
| _version_ | 1866902081020887040 |
|---|---|
| author | Osmolovskyi, Kostiantyn |
| author_facet | Osmolovskyi, Kostiantyn |
| contents | <p>This technical report develops a structural and regulatory account of conflict transformation in cognitive systems. Building on prior work that defined inter-system conflict as the absence of a shared admissible discrepancy structure, introduced inter-system tension and overload memory, formalized asymmetry in conflict burden, distinguished admissibility constraints on conflict processing, and analyzed escalation and locking as trajectory-dependent conflict regimes, the paper asks what it means for such a conflict to be transformed.</p> <p>The report distinguishes conflict transformation from de-escalation, interruption, and immediate resolution. A reduction of current tension does not by itself imply transformation, because conflict-generating conditions may remain unchanged. Conversely, transformation may temporarily increase current tension if previously inadmissible conflict-relevant discrepancies become accessible or if conflict-generating constraints become structurally update-admissible.</p> <p>Conflict transformation is defined as modification of the structural or regulatory conditions that generate, preserve, represent, compensate, update, or lock an inter-system conflict such that the conflict no longer follows the same admissibility-constrained trajectory. On this basis, the paper distinguishes several transformation modes: access transformation, representation transformation, compensability and overload transformation, updating transformation, and locking transformation.</p> <p>The resulting framework shows that transformation does not require immediate disappearance of the conflict condition. A conflict may remain present while becoming more processable, less rigidly represented, more compensable, less overloaded, more update-admissible, or less locked. Transformation is therefore treated as a structural-regulatory change in the trajectory conditions of conflict rather than as practical resolution, mediation, interruption, or simple reduction of current burden.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_20004042 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Conflict Transformation in Cognitive Systems Osmolovskyi, Kostiantyn (MeSH) Cognitive Science (EuroSciVoc) Artificial intelligence inter-system conflict conflict transformation admissibility constraints structural updating locking pressure overload memory cognitive systems <p>This technical report develops a structural and regulatory account of conflict transformation in cognitive systems. Building on prior work that defined inter-system conflict as the absence of a shared admissible discrepancy structure, introduced inter-system tension and overload memory, formalized asymmetry in conflict burden, distinguished admissibility constraints on conflict processing, and analyzed escalation and locking as trajectory-dependent conflict regimes, the paper asks what it means for such a conflict to be transformed.</p> <p>The report distinguishes conflict transformation from de-escalation, interruption, and immediate resolution. A reduction of current tension does not by itself imply transformation, because conflict-generating conditions may remain unchanged. Conversely, transformation may temporarily increase current tension if previously inadmissible conflict-relevant discrepancies become accessible or if conflict-generating constraints become structurally update-admissible.</p> <p>Conflict transformation is defined as modification of the structural or regulatory conditions that generate, preserve, represent, compensate, update, or lock an inter-system conflict such that the conflict no longer follows the same admissibility-constrained trajectory. On this basis, the paper distinguishes several transformation modes: access transformation, representation transformation, compensability and overload transformation, updating transformation, and locking transformation.</p> <p>The resulting framework shows that transformation does not require immediate disappearance of the conflict condition. A conflict may remain present while becoming more processable, less rigidly represented, more compensable, less overloaded, more update-admissible, or less locked. Transformation is therefore treated as a structural-regulatory change in the trajectory conditions of conflict rather than as practical resolution, mediation, interruption, or simple reduction of current burden.</p> |
| title | Conflict Transformation in Cognitive Systems |
| topic | (MeSH) Cognitive Science (EuroSciVoc) Artificial intelligence inter-system conflict conflict transformation admissibility constraints structural updating locking pressure overload memory cognitive systems |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20004042 |