Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20052418 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>Schrödinger’s equations remain among the most successful mathematical constructs in<br>the history of science, accurately predicting atomic spectra, chemical structure, quantum<br>transitions, tunneling behavior, and the dynamics of microscopic systems. Yet despite their<br>predictive success, the physical interpretation of the equations has remained controversial<br>since their introduction in 1926. The dominant Copenhagen interpretation treats the<br>wavefunction as a probabilistic abstraction rather than a direct description of physical<br>reality. Other interpretations introduce hidden variables, many worlds, pilot waves, or<br>informational frameworks, but the underlying mechanism of quantum behavior remains<br>debated.<br>This paper examines Schrödinger’s equations through the framework of Space-Phase<br>Physics (SP3), wherein physical reality is understood as arising from a real, conditionable<br>medium called space-phase. Within SP3, the wavefunction is reinterpreted not as a mere<br>probability amplitude but as a representation of conditioned medium organization.<br>Schrödinger’s equation becomes a behavioral equation describing how conditioned spacephase evolves, stores energy, maintains coherence, relaxes, guides matter, and stabilizes<br>persistent configurations.<br>The analysis maps the ten SP3 functions—conditionability, memory, reconfiguration,<br>guidance, saturation, coherence, relaxation, energy storage, pressure-gradient response,<br>and persistence/stability selection—onto the structure and operation of Schrödinger’s<br>formalism. Under this interpretation, quantum phenomena such as interference,<br>superposition, entanglement, quantization, and orbital stability emerge naturally as<br>behaviors of a real medium rather than paradoxes arising in empty space.<br>The paper argues that Schrödinger’s equations may have been an extraordinarily accurate<br>mathematical discovery whose underlying physical meaning remained incomplete<br>because twentieth-century physics progressively abandoned medium-based<br>interpretations of reality following the Michelson–Morley experiment and the rise of<br>geometric spacetime frameworks. SP3 proposes that the mathematics survived precisely<br>because nature itself continued operating through a medium, even while the conceptual<br>interpretation drifted away from mechanism</p>