Guardat en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Idioma: | |
| Publicat: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20056502 |
| Etiquetes: |
Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
Taula de continguts:
- <p>Abstract<br>The CKS pattern commits to conflicts as first-class substrate objects under a two-level handling<br>discipline (substrate-level preservation, cell-level resolution under orchestration rules).<br>Detect-resolve-forget is the architectural failure mode in which a deployment honors the first-level<br>commitment transiently — producing a contradiction edge at conflict emergence and recording conflict<br>provenance — and then undoes that preservation after resolution by removing the contradiction edge<br>from substrate. The substrate state that remains contains the resolution outcome but not the conflict that<br>produced it; humans exercising the inspect right cannot reconstruct what was in conflict before<br>resolution; the retraceable trail breaks at the forget moment. This note formalizes the anti-pattern as<br>four operational components, identifies the CKS commitments it violates (A1.03, A2.13, A2.17, A2.45,<br>A1.07 directly; A2.16 partially; A2.36–A2.39, A1.10, A1.01 by cascade), traces the failure mode,<br>specifies the architectural correction (persistent preservation, status-marking in place of removal,<br>archival as alternative to deletion), distinguishes the anti-pattern from four adjacent legitimate patterns,<br>and provides an operational test with three sharpening properties.</p>